USCIS will now send some affirmative asylum applications straight to immigration judges without an interview, a bid to break up a 1.6 million-case backlog that grew 22 percent in a year.
The Department of Homeland Security published an interim final rule Monday, effective immediately, letting U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services skip the standard interview for certain affirmative asylum applicants and refer their cases directly to the Executive Office for Immigration Review. Fox News broke the story first, and both RedState and YourNews independently confirmed the rule's text and its same-day effective date.
The old process required USCIS asylum officers to interview nearly every affirmative applicant, then refer denials to an immigration judge for a second review from scratch. DHS told Fox News Digital that double review is exactly the problem: cases get worked twice, once by an asylum officer and again by a judge, while the pile of unresolved applications keeps growing. "In order to reduce the affirmative asylum backlog, improve efficiency of operations, safeguard national security and public safety and ensure consistency with agency priorities, USCIS will no longer offer interviews to all affirmative applicants prior to referral to EOIR," the agency wrote in the rule itself.
The numbers explain the urgency. USCIS reported 1.6 million pending affirmative asylum applications as of March, up 22 percent from the year before. Zoom out further and the picture gets worse: 3,195,137 cases sat before the nation's immigration courts at the end of June, with roughly 570 immigration judges nationwide to work through them. Applicants filing today can wait years for a hearing. Administration officials argue the interview requirement, layered on top of an already overloaded court docket, mostly delayed outcomes for both genuine refugees and applicants gaming the system for work permits and time in the country.
That's the administration's real target. Affirmative asylum, filed by people not yet in removal proceedings, has long been used by immigration attorneys as a way to secure work authorization while a claim drags through the pipeline for years. Cutting the interview step doesn't eliminate anyone's day in court. It moves that day earlier, in front of a judge instead of an asylum officer, and DHS says it frees up officer time for applicants with credible persecution claims.
USCIS is taking public comments on the interim rule for 60 days before issuing a final version, the standard path for a rule imposed immediately under good-cause exceptions to normal notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Advocates warn of due process fights
Immigration lawyers are already raising due process objections, warning the change could be used to fast-track denials and subsequent deportations without the fact-finding an interview provides, according to Courthouse News Service. No lawsuit specific to this rule had been filed as of Monday, but the pattern is familiar. Legal aid groups led by the American Immigration Council sued in February to block a separate EOIR rule that shortened Board of Immigration Appeals briefing schedules and expanded single-judge summary dismissals, arguing in Amica Center for Immigrant Rights v. EOIR that the change bypassed proper rulemaking and gutted meaningful appellate review. Expect similar arguments if opponents challenge this interview rule once the comment period closes.
DHS has anticipated the criticism by framing the rule as a triage tool, not a rollback of asylum protections. Applicants still get a hearing. They still get a judge. What changes is who does the first read of their case, and how many times the government does that read before a decision sticks.
The test now is whether the rule actually moves the backlog number. DHS has not published a specific reduction target, and the agency will need to show it in the next round of USCIS data before critics stop calling this a paperwork shortcut and start calling it what the White House wants it to be: proof the system can move faster without abandoning anyone with a real claim. The 60-day comment window will also show how much organized legal resistance is coming, and whether it arrives before or after the rule goes final.
Also read: Jeffries wont rule out an abolish ICE vote if Democrats retake the House • Federal judge strikes down Illinois in-state tuition for illegal immigrants • Justice Department sues Colorado over in-state tuition for illegal immigrants
